Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).

Keywords
  • monophyly
  • Daucus
  • carrots
  • alleles
  • germplasm conservation
  • data collection
  • topology
  • nucleotide sequences
  • DNA
Publication Dbxref
PMID:25077508
Structured Abstract Part
  • UNLABELLED
    •

  • PREMISE OF THE STUDY
    We explored the utility of multiple nuclear orthologs for the taxonomic resolution of wild and cultivated carrot, Daucus species.•

  • METHODS
    We studied the phylogeny of 92 accessions of 13 species and two subspecies of Daucus and 15 accessions of related genera (107 accessions total) with DNA sequences of 94 nuclear orthologs. Reiterative analyses examined data of both alleles using ambiguity codes or a single allele with the highest coverage, trimmed vs. untrimmed homopolymers; pure exonic vs. pure intronic data; the use of all 94 markers vs. a reduced subset of markers; and analysis of a concatenated data set vs. a coalescent (species tree) approach.•

  • KEY RESULTS
    Our maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood trees were highly resolved, with 100% bootstrap support for most of the external and many of the internal clades. They resolved multiple accessions of many different species as monophyletic with strong support, but failed to support other species. The single allele analysis gave slightly better topological resolution; trimming homopolymers failed to increase taxonomic resolution; the exonic data had a smaller proportion of parsimony-informative characters. Similar results demonstrating the same dominant topology can be obtained with many fewer markers. A Bayesian concordance analysis provided an overall similar phylogeny, but the coalescent analysis provided drastic changes in topology to all the above.•

  • CONCLUSIONS
    Our research highlights some difficult species groups in Daucus and misidentifications in germplasm collections. It highlights a useful subset of markers and approaches for future studies of dominant topologies in Daucus.

Title
Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).
Publication Type
Journal Article
Series Name
American journal of botany
Volume
101
Publication Year
2014
Issue
10
Page Numbers
1666-85
DOI
10.3732/ajb.1400106
Journal Abbreviation
Am. J. Bot.
EISSN
1537-2197
Publication Date
2014 Oct
Citation
Arbizu C, Ruess H, Senalik D, Simon PW, Spooner DM. Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).. American journal of botany. 2014 Oct; 101(10):1666-85.
ISSN
1537-2197
Language Abbr
eng
Publication Model
Print-Electronic
Authors
Arbizu C, Ruess H, Senalik D, Simon PW, Spooner DM
Language
English
Elocation
10.3732/ajb.1400106
Journal Country
United States
Abstract

UNLABELLED
•

PREMISE OF THE STUDY
We explored the utility of multiple nuclear orthologs for the taxonomic resolution of wild and cultivated carrot, Daucus species.•

METHODS
We studied the phylogeny of 92 accessions of 13 species and two subspecies of Daucus and 15 accessions of related genera (107 accessions total) with DNA sequences of 94 nuclear orthologs. Reiterative analyses examined data of both alleles using ambiguity codes or a single allele with the highest coverage, trimmed vs. untrimmed homopolymers; pure exonic vs. pure intronic data; the use of all 94 markers vs. a reduced subset of markers; and analysis of a concatenated data set vs. a coalescent (species tree) approach.•

KEY RESULTS
Our maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood trees were highly resolved, with 100% bootstrap support for most of the external and many of the internal clades. They resolved multiple accessions of many different species as monophyletic with strong support, but failed to support other species. The single allele analysis gave slightly better topological resolution; trimming homopolymers failed to increase taxonomic resolution; the exonic data had a smaller proportion of parsimony-informative characters. Similar results demonstrating the same dominant topology can be obtained with many fewer markers. A Bayesian concordance analysis provided an overall similar phylogeny, but the coalescent analysis provided drastic changes in topology to all the above.•

CONCLUSIONS
Our research highlights some difficult species groups in Daucus and misidentifications in germplasm collections. It highlights a useful subset of markers and approaches for future studies of dominant topologies in Daucus.

Is Obsolete
False