Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).

Keywords
  • monophyly
  • Daucus
  • carrots
  • alleles
  • germplasm conservation
  • data collection
  • topology
  • nucleotide sequences
  • DNA
Publication Dbxref
PMID:25077508
Structured Abstract Part
  • UNLABELLED

  • PREMISE OF THE STUDY
    We explored the utility of multiple nuclear orthologs for the taxonomic resolution of wild and cultivated carrot, Daucus species.•

  • METHODS
    We studied the phylogeny of 92 accessions of 13 species and two subspecies of Daucus and 15 accessions of related genera (107 accessions total) with DNA sequences of 94 nuclear orthologs. Reiterative analyses examined data of both alleles using ambiguity codes or a single allele with the highest coverage, trimmed vs. untrimmed homopolymers; pure exonic vs. pure intronic data; the use of all 94 markers vs. a reduced subset of markers; and analysis of a concatenated data set vs. a coalescent (species tree) approach.•

  • KEY RESULTS
    Our maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood trees were highly resolved, with 100% bootstrap support for most of the external and many of the internal clades. They resolved multiple accessions of many different species as monophyletic with strong support, but failed to support other species. The single allele analysis gave slightly better topological resolution; trimming homopolymers failed to increase taxonomic resolution; the exonic data had a smaller proportion of parsimony-informative characters. Similar results demonstrating the same dominant topology can be obtained with many fewer markers. A Bayesian concordance analysis provided an overall similar phylogeny, but the coalescent analysis provided drastic changes in topology to all the above.•

  • CONCLUSIONS
    Our research highlights some difficult species groups in Daucus and misidentifications in germplasm collections. It highlights a useful subset of markers and approaches for future studies of dominant topologies in Daucus.

Title
Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).
Publication Type
Journal Article
Series Name
American journal of botany
Volume
101
Publication Year
2014
Issue
10
Page Numbers
1666-85
DOI
10.3732/ajb.1400106
Journal Abbreviation
Am. J. Bot.
EISSN
1537-2197
Publication Date
2014 Oct
Unique Local Identifier

Arbizu C, Ruess H, Senalik D, Simon PW, Spooner DM. Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).. American journal of botany. 2014 Oct; 101(10):1666-85.

Citation
Arbizu C, Ruess H, Senalik D, Simon PW, Spooner DM. Phylogenomics of the carrot genus (Daucus, Apiaceae).. American journal of botany. 2014 Oct; 101(10):1666-85.
ISSN
1537-2197
Language Abbr
eng
Publication Model
Print-Electronic
Authors
Arbizu C, Ruess H, Senalik D, Simon PW, Spooner DM
Language
English
Elocation
10.3732/ajb.1400106
Journal Country
United States
Abstract

UNLABELLED

PREMISE OF THE STUDY
We explored the utility of multiple nuclear orthologs for the taxonomic resolution of wild and cultivated carrot, Daucus species.•

METHODS
We studied the phylogeny of 92 accessions of 13 species and two subspecies of Daucus and 15 accessions of related genera (107 accessions total) with DNA sequences of 94 nuclear orthologs. Reiterative analyses examined data of both alleles using ambiguity codes or a single allele with the highest coverage, trimmed vs. untrimmed homopolymers; pure exonic vs. pure intronic data; the use of all 94 markers vs. a reduced subset of markers; and analysis of a concatenated data set vs. a coalescent (species tree) approach.•

KEY RESULTS
Our maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood trees were highly resolved, with 100% bootstrap support for most of the external and many of the internal clades. They resolved multiple accessions of many different species as monophyletic with strong support, but failed to support other species. The single allele analysis gave slightly better topological resolution; trimming homopolymers failed to increase taxonomic resolution; the exonic data had a smaller proportion of parsimony-informative characters. Similar results demonstrating the same dominant topology can be obtained with many fewer markers. A Bayesian concordance analysis provided an overall similar phylogeny, but the coalescent analysis provided drastic changes in topology to all the above.•

CONCLUSIONS
Our research highlights some difficult species groups in Daucus and misidentifications in germplasm collections. It highlights a useful subset of markers and approaches for future studies of dominant topologies in Daucus.

Is Obsolete
False
Germplasm
  • Daucus carota subsp. maximus Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. gummifer Portugal
  • Daucus carota Morocco
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Italy
  • Daucus carota subsp. gummifer France
  • Daucus carota subsp. major
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus capillifolius Libya
  • Ammi visnaga Tunisia
  • Oenanthe virgata Tunisia
  • Astrodaucus littoralis Azerbaijan
  • Caucalis platycarpos Germany
  • Turgenia latifolia Syrian Arab Republic (Syria)
  • Unident-Apiaceae spp. Morocco
  • Daucus durieua Morocco
  • Daucus durieua Morocco
  • Unident-Apiaceae spp. Morocco
  • Torilis leptophylla Syrian Arab Republic (Syria)
  • Unident-Apiaceae spp. Morocco
  • Orlaya daucoides Turkey
  • Orlaya daucorlaya Greece
  • Daucus broteri Turkey
  • Daucus littoralis Turkey
  • Daucus involucratus Turkey
  • Daucus involucratus Greece
  • Daucus involucratus Turkey
  • Daucus glochidiatus
  • Daucus guttatus Turkey
  • Daucus broteri Greece
  • Daucus guttatus Greece
  • Daucus pusillus Uruguay
  • Daucus pusillus United States of America
  • Daucus pusillus United States of America
  • Daucus littoralis Israel
  • Daucus littoralis Israel
  • Daucus guttatus Israel
  • Daucus guttatus Syrian Arab Republic (Syria)
  • Daucus carota subsp. major Turkey
  • Daucus broteri Syrian Arab Republic (Syria)
  • Daucus carota
  • Daucus broteri Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Daucus carota subsp. fontanesii Turkey
  • Daucus tenuisectus Morocco
  • Daucus tenuisectus Morocco
  • Daucus crinitus Portugal
  • Daucus crinitus Portugal
  • Daucus crinitus Portugal
  • Daucus crinitus Portugal
  • Daucus aureus Israel
  • Daucus aureus Israel
  • Daucus aureus France
  • Daucus muricatus Portugal
  • Daucus muricatus Spain
  • Daucus muricatus Tunisia
  • Pseudorlaya pumila Tunisia
  • Margotia gummifera Tunisia
  • Daucus syrticus Tunisia
  • Daucus sahariensis Tunisia
  • Daucus syrticus Tunisia
  • Daucus syrticus Tunisia
  • Daucus sahariensis Tunisia
  • Daucus sahariensis Tunisia
  • Daucus syrticus Tunisia
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Spain
  • Daucus carota subsp. maritimus Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. maritimus Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. maritimus Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. fontanesii Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. gummifer Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. halophilus
  • Daucus carota subsp. gummifer Portugal
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus capillifolius Tunisia
  • Daucus hybr. Tunisia
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus capillifolius Tunisia
  • Daucus capillifolius Tunisia
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Tunisia
  • Daucus carota Tunisia
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Tunisia
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Syrian Arab Republic (Syria)
  • Daucus carota subsp. maximus Albania
  • Daucus carota subsp. maximus Portugal
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Hungary
  • Daucus carota subsp. maritimus
  • Daucus carota Spain
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Austria
  • Daucus carota subsp. major Germany
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota United States of America
  • Daucus carota subsp. commutatus France
  • Daucus carota subsp. gadecaei France
  • Daucus carota Denmark
  • Daucus carota subsp. commutatus
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota United States of America
  • Daucus carota Spain
  • Daucus carota subsp. major Greece
  • Daucus carota subsp. carota Netherlands
  • Daucus carota var. atrorubens Egypt